<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All my bags are unpacked&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christaallan.com/all-my-bags-are-unpacked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christaallan.com/all-my-bags-are-unpacked/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://christaallan.com/all-my-bags-are-unpacked/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christaallan.com/?p=653#comment-631</guid>
		<description>hahah I love this! It feels like I'm sitting in English class all over again. But for some reason, no matter how often I hear it, I always describe the author's diction in terms of how he uses it and not the type he uses. Fabulous, wonderful, depressing diction authors do have but formal, concrete, colloquial diction continues to be beyond their grasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahah I love this! It feels like I&#8217;m sitting in English class all over again. But for some reason, no matter how often I hear it, I always describe the author&#8217;s diction in terms of how he uses it and not the type he uses. Fabulous, wonderful, depressing diction authors do have but formal, concrete, colloquial diction continues to be beyond their grasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
